Litigation Drives Endangered Species Act to the Detriment of Species and People
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
June 19, 2012
|
Jill Strait, Spencer Pederson or Crystal Feldman
(202-225-2761)
Today, the House Committee on Natural Resources continued its series of full committee oversight hearings on how to improve and update the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Today’s hearing focused on ESA litigation and how attorneys’ fees are being used by certain organizations to continue endless lawsuits. Witnesses at the hearing detailed specific cases throughout the country where ESA lawsuits have blocked or delayed important societal activities, including the construction of an elementary school.
“The original purpose of the ESA was to help recover endangered species and remove them from the list, not force taxpayers to reward an army of environmental lawyers to exploit vague definitions and deadlines that realistically cannot be met. The dramatic proliferation of lawsuits has serious consequences for both species recovery and our economy,” said Chairman Doc Hastings (WA-04). “While a few environmental lawyers rake in the federal cash at hundreds of dollars per hour, the needs of truly endangered species suffer. More seriously, American jobs are lost and people are hurt. ... We need to move beyond a system where species are added to the list, but never come off. Increasing the number of ESA species shouldn’t be the primary goal. It should be to recover species and get them taken off the list. Litigation that blocks economic activity and public needs, such as building schools, not only impedes recovery, it diminishes trust of taxpayers who are subsidizing that litigation.” Witnesses at the hearing cited several instances in which ESA-related litigation has threatened, prevented, or delayed important economic activity:
### |
Sign up to receive news, updates and insights directly to your inbox.