Dept. of Interior More Interested in Working with Mexico and Canada than U.S. Border Patrol to Secure Our Borders?
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
April 30, 2010
|
Jill Strait or Spencer Pederson
(202-225-2761)
As the Obama Administration and the Congressional Democrats scramble to cobble together a response to growing concerns on the U.S.-Mexico border - particularly on federal lands, where Border Patrol is unable to effectively monitor and patrol - a recent comment from Department of Interior (DOI) Secretary Ken Salazar has shed some light on DOI’s inability to address the problem.
When recently asked by a reporter:
Secretary Salazar responded:
Strikingly absent from Secretary Salazar’s statement is any mention of communication with U.S. Border Patrol or the acknowledgement that Border Patrol is blocked from effectively doing their job on federal lands due to Wilderness designations and endangered species concerns. Apparently, the Secretary believes that communication between DOI and our two border neighbors is more important than getting the Interior Department to reverse course and start working with, rather than against, the Department of Homeland Security – the U.S. agency with primary jurisdiction over the border. It is imperative that Border Patrol have access to the public lands on our borders for the purpose of ensuring our national security from drug smugglers, human traffickers, known murderers and potential terrorists who target our federal lands as access points into the U.S. Because the Interior Department has failed to address these concerns, Republicans introduced legislation (H.R. 5016) to ensure that the Interior Department and Department of Agriculture do not impede or restrict Border Patrol from effectively doing their to job to secure the border on public lands. # # # |
Sign up to receive news, updates and insights directly to your inbox.