Home > newsroom > Page
Interior Official: Land Consolidation Program Failing Native Americans, Taxpayers


WASHINGTON, D.C., May 23, 2017 -

Today, the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs held a hearing on the Department of the Interior’s  (DOI) Cobell Land Consolidation Program. The program authorizes DOI to purchase highly fractionated allotments and consolidate them in tribal ownership. After an expenditure of over $1 billion, it remains unclear that the program has greatly reduced Indian land fractionation.  

Indian land fractionation has been an enormous burden for the Department, and it has denied thousands of individual Indians any economic benefit from their lands,” Subcommittee Chairman Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) said.It’s fair to ask: what kind of progress has been made, and has the program been a success?

In many cases, a single tract of Indian land can be owned by dozens or hundreds of Indians. As generations of Indian owners die intestate, their heirs each own tiny, undivided interests often in multiple tracts. Consolidation into a single owner reduces the DOI’s burden in administering these lands and benefits Native Americans by increasing the potential for productively using these properties.

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Department of the Interior Jason Cason testified that the Obama administration-run program “has not been successful in materially reducing fractional interests” despite spending $1.3 billion dollars to date.

It seems obvious to me that this is not something that we can just spend our way out of, but rather requires a careful approach and additional planning,Rep. Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (R-American Samoa) stated.  

Cason offered two options for the future of the program: either leaving the initial legislation in place and allowing the program to use the remaining funds to resolve a tiny portion of fractionation, or allow Interior to “leverage the reaming $586 million dollars to carefully target interests.” This would create a stream of revenue that could be put back into the program.

The program will end in 2022, but the funds will be depleted long before the sunset date. Without reform – administratively or legislatively – fractionation will continue to drain resources needed to meet DOI’s responsibilities to tribes across the country.

I view the Buy-Back Program as a once in a lifetime opportunity to meaningfully address fractional interests that plague tribal communities and their efforts towards sovereignty and self-determination,” Cason stated.[I]n my mind we are almost back where we started eight years later, just treading water.”

Click here to view full witness testimony.


Contact: Committee Press Office 202-226-9019

Latest News

Committee Probes CBD on Relationship with Foreign Entities, Opposition to U.S. Military Operations

Today, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-Utah) and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) sent a letter to Center for Biological Diversit...... Read more

Bishop Statement on President Trump’s Executive Order on Ocean Policy

House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-Utah), today issued the following statement in reaction to President Trump’s executive order promoting a healthy ocean economy and engagement w...... Read more

Pearce Introduces Two Bills in the House of Representatives

Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) released the following statement regarding two bills he has sponsored, H.R. 6106, Common Sense Permitting and H.R. 6107, Ending Duplicative Permitting Act, which were introd...... Read more

View All News

Calendar

Legislative Hearing on Offshore Renewable Energy Opportunities
EMR Hearing | 1324 Longworth House Office Building
Full Committee Markup
FC Markup | 1324 Longworth House Office Building
View All Events