Home > issues > Page
The Committee is conducting an investigation into how and why the decision was made by the Obama Administration to subject 2012 Secure Rural School (SRS) funds to the 2013 sequestration cuts. The Administration has failed to fully comply with repeated requests for documents and Congressionally issued subpoenas to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The SRS program helps provide rural counties with funds to pay for essential services such as education, police officers, emergency services, and infrastructure.

UPDATE (1/14/2014): Committee Majority staff releases report: A Less Secure Future for Rural Schools: An Investigation into the Obama Administration’s Questionable Application of the Sequester to the Secure Rural Schools Program.”

Below are the documents and emails the Committee has obtained to date:

Background:

Due to the continued inability of the federal government to manage National Forest lands and provide local communities with a meaningful share of revenues from timber receipts, Congress has approved SRS payments to provide rural counties with funds for teachers, schools, police officers, emergency services and infrastructure. The SRS program was extended through fiscal year 2012 as part of the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act,” that was signed into law by President Obama on July 6, 2012. The Department of Agriculture distributed $323 million to 41 states in accordance with that law in January of 2013. On March 19, 2013 the Obama Administration announced, citing the 2013 sequestration cuts, it was requesting repayment of $17.9 million in SRS and 25% fund payments that had already been disbursed to states.

Thirty-one Members of Congress sent a bipartisan letter to the USDA and OMB requesting that the repayment be halted and asked for a detailed explanation of the legal authority for demanding repayment of the funds. State Governors of both parties also informed the Administration that they would not repay the funds due to the questionable legal authority.

On May 20, 2013, Chairman Hastings sent oversight letters to the USDA and OMB requesting documents and information on how this decision was reached and the legal authority. After receiving no response by the Committee’s June 3rd deadline, initial follow up letters were sent to the USDA and OMB on July 18. Second follow up letters providing a final opportunity to comply voluntarily with the Committee’s document requests were sent on July 31. The same day, at a Full Committee markup, Chairman Hastings stated his plans to issue subpoenas if the Administration failed to respond in a timely manner.

On September 4, 2013, Chairman Hastings issued subpoenas to the USDA and OMB for documents. Since the September 18th subpoena deadline passed, the USDA produced 1049 pages of email communications and other documents, about 700 pages of which are copies of form letters. The OMB produced approximately 160 pages, consisting mostly of email communications between OMB and USDA and the Forest Service in January and February 2013.

The limited documents produced by the USDA and OMB raise significant questions about the rationale and legal authority behind the Obama Administration’s decision to sequester SRS money paid to states in January 2013. For example, internal emails show that the Forest Service notified OMB in February that, based on advice from the Office of General Counsel, money already paid to the states would not be subject to the sequester.

On November 5th, the Committee sent additional letters reiterating the Committee’s expectation of full compliance with the subpoenas and indicating the intention to hold an oversight hearing including testimony from Secretary Vilsack and Director Mathews Burwell.

Related Documents:

Recent Activity:

Show

Latest News

Bishop: President’s Budget Stubs Out Hardworking Americans

Today, the Obama Administration released its budget proposal for the 2017 fiscal year. Chairman Bishop (R-UT) issued the following statement: “To defend this budget would require spin with dexterity t...... Read more

New York Times: Officials Warn Congress of Major Defaults Without Restructuring

Puerto Rico and its top advisers made their case in Washington on Friday for a law that would allow broad restructuring of the island’s multibillion-dollar debt, saying that if Congress did not act so...... Read more

Bishop: FWS Mimics EPA Tactics in Expansive Critical Habitat Proposal

Today, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service announced the finalization of a new policy for defining and designating critical habitat under the Endangered Specie...... Read more

View All News

Calendar

The Costly Impacts of Predation and Conflicting Federal Statutes on Native and Endangered Fish Species
Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans | 1334 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
Legislative Hearing on H.R. 87, H.R. 295, H.R. 1621 and H.R. 2817
Subcommittee on Federal Lands | 1324 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
The U.S. Department of Treasury's Analysis of the Situation in Puerto Rico
Full Committee | 1324 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
View All Events