Home > newsroom > Page
Dept. of Interior More Interested in Working with Mexico and Canada than U.S. Border Patrol to Secure Our Borders?


WASHINGTON, D.C., April 30, 2010 - As the Obama Administration and the Congressional Democrats scramble to cobble together a response to growing concerns on the U.S.-Mexico border - particularly on federal lands, where Border Patrol is unable to effectively monitor and patrol - a recent comment from Department of Interior (DOI) Secretary Ken Salazar has shed some light on DOI’s inability to address the problem.

When recently asked by a reporter:

“Last week Republicans introduced legislation that would prohibit the Department of Interior from impeding Border Patrol operations on federal lands. Do you think the Department of Interior should get out of the way of the Border Patrol agency, from, from them doing their, their job?"

Secretary Salazar responded:

“We have a national security imperative in our borders, but we believe that the national security can be met at the same time that we recognize the important ecological values that we have across the border and it has certainly been the case where we’ve worked well with both Mexico as well as with Canada in terms of transnational cross border issues that have to do wildlife and national parks issues and we hope to continue that agenda.”

Strikingly absent from Secretary Salazar’s statement is any mention of communication with U.S. Border Patrol or the acknowledgement that Border Patrol is blocked from effectively doing their job on federal lands due to Wilderness designations and endangered species concerns.

Apparently, the Secretary believes that communication between DOI and our two border neighbors is more important than getting the Interior Department to reverse course and start working with, rather than against, the Department of Homeland Security – the U.S. agency with primary jurisdiction over the border.

It is imperative that Border Patrol have access to the public lands on our borders for the purpose of ensuring our national security from drug smugglers, human traffickers, known murderers and potential terrorists who target our federal lands as access points into the U.S.

Because the Interior Department has failed to address these concerns, Republicans introduced legislation (H.R. 5016) to ensure that the Interior Department and Department of Agriculture do not impede or restrict Border Patrol from effectively doing their to job to secure the border on public lands.

# # #

Print version of this document


Contact: Jill Strait or Spencer Pederson (202) 226-2311

Latest News

Proposed Legislation Aims to Ensure Input of Local Communities in Federal Land Management Decisions

Today, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands held a legislative hearing on the discussion draft of “Locally-elected Officials Cooperating with Agencies in Land Management Act (LOCAL Management Act).” The ...... Read more

Environmental Laws Threaten Safety in Borderland Communities

Today, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing on impediments imposed by federal land management regimes in securing the international borders of the United States. Federal lan...... Read more

Federal Land Management Agency’s Duplicative Regulation Acts in Opposition to Its ‘Stated’ Purpose

Today, the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held an oversight hearing on a recent regulation issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding methane on federal lands. While the BLM...... Read more

View All News

Calendar

Local and State Perspectives on BLM’s Draft Planning 2.0 Rule
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations | 1324 Longworth House Office Building Washington D.C. 20515
View All Events