Home > calendar > Page
Oversight Field Hearing on "Protecting the Rights of Property Owners: Proposed Federal Critical Habitat Designations Gone Wild"
Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:00 AM
Full Committee
University of Arkansas Community College, Independence Hall, 2005 White Drive, Batesville, Arkansas


Oversight Field Hearing on:

  • "Protecting the Rights of Property Owners: Proposed Federal Critical Habitat Designations Gone Wild"

Archived Video Webcast:

Get Adobe Flash player

Member Statements:

The Honorable Doc Hastings
Chairman

Witnesses and Testimony:

PANEL I

Mr. Marcus Creasy
Arkansas Cattlemen’s Association
Heber Springs, Arkansas

Mr. Peter Day
Director
Camp Ozark
Mt. Ida, Arkansas

Ms. Cynthia Dohner
Southeast Regional Director
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Atlanta, Georgia

Mr. Joe Fox
State Forester
Arkansas Forestry Commission
Little Rock, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

Mr. Noah Greenwald*
Endangered Species Director
Center for Biological Diversity
Portland, Oregon

Mr. Gregory Hamilton, PhD
Senior Research Economist
University of Arkansas Little Rock Institute for Economic Advancement
Little Rock, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

Mr. Roland McDaniel
Principal, Senior Scientist
GBMC & Associates
Bryant, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

Mr. Gene Pharr
Farmer
Lincoln, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

Ms. Cyn Sarthou*
Executive Director
Gulf Restoration Network
New Orleans, Louisiana

Mr. Randy Veach
President
Arkansas Farm Bureau
Little Rock, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

Mr. Curtis Warner
Director of Compliance & Support
Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
Little Rock, Arkansas
(Truth in Testimony Form)

* Mr. Greenwald and Ms. Sarthou were invited by the Committee but declined to attend.

Background:

According to the Association of Arkansas Counties (AAC), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed rule will designate a total of 769.2 river miles in Arkansas as critical habitat for Neosho muckets and rabbitsfoot mussels. The proposed critical habitat designations will directly impact 31 Arkansas counties and the targeted watershed will cover approximately 42% of the entire geographical area of Arkansas. The AAC’s members are concerned that the “proposed critical habitat designation will result in costly and disruptive impacts that may or may not produce corresponding benefits, in part because so little is known about the specific habitat requirements for these species. The Arkansas Environmental Federation, the Arkansas Association of Conservation Districts and the Arkansas Farm Bureau have concerns as well.

Related Documents:

Latest News

Bishop: FWS Mimics EPA Tactics in Expansive Critical Habitat Proposal

Today, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service announced the finalization of a new policy for defining and designating critical habitat under the Endangered Specie...... Read more

Committee Advances Bipartisan “National 9/11 Memorial at the World Trade Center Act”

Today, the Committee on Natural Resources passed H.R. 3036 (Rep. Tom MacArthur, R-NJ), the “National 9/11 Memorial at the World Trade Center Act,” legislation designating the National September 11 Mem...... Read more

New York Times: How Free Electricity Helped Dig $9 Billion Hole in Puerto Rico

To understand how Puerto Rico’s power authority has piled up $9 billion in debt, one need only visit this bustling city on the northwest coast. Twenty years ago, it was just another town with dwindlin...... Read more

View All News

Calendar

The Costly Impacts of Predation and Conflicting Federal Statutes on Native and Endangered Fish Species
Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans | 1334 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
Legislative Hearing on H.R. 87, H.R. 295, H.R. 1621 and H.R. 2817
Subcommittee on Federal Lands | 1324 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
View All Events